image/jpeg: reconstruct progressive images even if incomplete.

image/jpeg: reconstruct progressive images even if incomplete.

Fixes #14522.

As I said on that issue:

----
This is a progressive JPEG image. There are two dimensions of
progressivity: spectral selection (variables zs and ze in scan.go,
ranging in [0, 63]) and successive approximation (variables ah and al in
scan.go, ranging in [0, 8), from LSB to MSB, although ah=0 implicitly
means ah=8).

For this particular image, there are three components, and the SOS
markers contain this progression:

zs, ze, ah, al:  0  0 0 0	components: 0, 1, 2
zs, ze, ah, al:  1 63 0 0	components: 1
zs, ze, ah, al:  1 63 0 0	components: 2
zs, ze, ah, al:  1 63 0 2	components: 0
zs, ze, ah, al:  1 10 2 1	components: 0
zs, ze, ah, al: 11 63 2 1	components: 0
zs, ze, ah, al:  1 10 1 0	components: 0

The combination of all of these is complete (i.e. spectra 0 to 63 and
bits 8 exclusive to 0) for components 1 and 2, but it is incomplete for
component 0 (the luma component). In particular, there is no data for
component 0, spectra 11 to 63 and bits 1 exclusive to 0.

The image/jpeg code, as of Go 1.6, waits until both dimensions are
complete before performing the de-quantization, IDCT and copy to an
*image.YCbCr. This is the "if zigEnd != blockSize-1 || al != 0 { ...
continue }" code and associated commentary in scan.go.

Almost all progressive JPEG images end up complete in both dimensions
for all components, but this particular image is incomplete for
component 0, so the Go code never writes anything to the Y values of the
resultant *image.YCbCr, which is why the broken output is so dark (but
still looks recognizable in terms of red and blue hues).

My reading of the ITU T.81 JPEG specification (Annex G) doesn't
explicitly say that this is a valid image, but it also doesn't rule it
out.

In any case, the fix is, for progressive JPEG images, to always
reconstruct the decoded blocks (by performing the de-quantization, IDCT
and copy to an *image.YCbCr), regardless of whether or not they end up
complete. Note that, in Go, the jpeg.Decode function does not return
until the entire image is decoded, so we still only want to reconstruct
each block once, not once per SOS (Start Of Scan) marker.
----

A test image was also added, based on video-001.progressive.jpeg. When
decoding that image, inserting a

println("nComp, zs, ze, ah, al:", nComp, zigStart, zigEnd, ah, al)

into decoder.processSOS in scan.go prints:

nComp, zs, ze, ah, al: 3 0 0 0 1
nComp, zs, ze, ah, al: 1 1 5 0 2
nComp, zs, ze, ah, al: 1 1 63 0 1
nComp, zs, ze, ah, al: 1 1 63 0 1
nComp, zs, ze, ah, al: 1 6 63 0 2
nComp, zs, ze, ah, al: 1 1 63 2 1
nComp, zs, ze, ah, al: 3 0 0 1 0
nComp, zs, ze, ah, al: 1 1 63 1 0
nComp, zs, ze, ah, al: 1 1 63 1 0
nComp, zs, ze, ah, al: 1 1 63 1 0

In other words, video-001.progressive.jpeg contains 10 different scans.
This little program below drops half of them (remembering to keep the
"\xff\xd9" End of Image marker):

----
package main

import (
	"bytes"
	"io/ioutil"
	"log"
)

func main() {
	sos := []byte{0xff, 0xda}
	eoi := []byte{0xff, 0xd9}

	src, err := ioutil.ReadFile("video-001.progressive.jpeg")
	if err != nil {
		log.Fatal(err)
	}
	b := bytes.Split(src, sos)
	println(len(b)) // Prints 11.
	dst := bytes.Join(b[:5], sos)
	dst = append(dst, eoi...)
	if err := ioutil.WriteFile("video-001.progressive.truncated.jpeg", dst, 0666); err != nil {
		log.Fatal(err)
	}
}
----

The video-001.progressive.truncated.jpeg was converted to png via
libjpeg and ImageMagick:

djpeg -nosmooth video-001.progressive.truncated.jpeg > tmp.tga
convert tmp.tga video-001.progressive.truncated.png
rm tmp.tga

Change-Id: I72b20cd4fb6746d36d8d4d587f891fb3bc641f84
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21062
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>