[release-branch.go1.23] runtime: store bp on cgocallback as unsafe.Pointer
As of CL 580255, the runtime tracks the frame pointer (or base pointer,
bp) when entering syscalls, so that we can use fpTracebackPCs on
goroutines that are sitting in syscalls. That CL mostly got things
right, but missed one very subtle detail.
When calling from Go->C->Go, the goroutine stack performing the calls
when returning to Go is free to move around in memory due to growth,
shrinking, etc. But upon returning back to C, it needs to restore
gp.syscall*, including gp.syscallsp and gp.syscallbp. The way syscallsp
currently gets updated is automagically: it's stored as an
unsafe.Pointer on the stack so that it shows up in a stack map. If the
stack ever moves, it'll get updated correctly. But gp.syscallbp isn't
saved to the stack as an unsafe.Pointer, but rather as a uintptr, so it
never gets updated! As a result, in rare circumstances, fpTracebackPCs
can correctly try to use gp.syscallbp as the starting point for the
traceback, but the value is stale.
This change fixes the problem by just storing gp.syscallbp to the stack
on cgocallback as an unsafe.Pointer, like gp.syscallsp. It also adds a
comment documenting this subtlety; the lack of explanation for the
unsafe.Pointer type on syscallsp meant this detail was missed -- let's
not miss it again in the future.
Now, we have a fix, what about a test? Unfortunately, testing this is
going to be incredibly annoying because the circumstances under which
gp.syscallbp are actually used for traceback are non-deterministic and
hard to arrange, especially from within testprogcgo where we don't have
export_test.go and can't reach into the runtime.
So, instead, add a gp.syscallbp check to reentersyscall and
entersyscallblock that mirrors the gp.syscallbp consistency check. This
probably causes some miniscule slowdown to the syscall path, but it'll
catch the issue without having to actually perform a traceback.
For #69085.
Fixes #69087.
Change-Id: Iaf771758f1666024b854f5fbe2b2c63cbe35b201
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/608775
Reviewed-by: Nick Ripley <nick.ripley@datadoghq.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>
(cherry picked from commit
54fe0fd43fcf8609666c16ae6d15ed92873b1564)
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/608835