The DFS scheduler doesn't do the right thing. If a Value x is used by
more than one other Value, then x is put into the DFS queue when
its first user (call it y) is visited. It is not removed and reinserted
when the second user of x (call it z) is visited, so the dependency
between x and z is not respected. There is no easy way to fix this with
the DFS queue because we'd have to rip values out of the middle of the
DFS queue.
The new scheduler works from the end of the block backwards, scheduling
instructions which have had all of their uses already scheduled.
A simple priority scheme breaks ties between multiple instructions that
are ready to schedule simultaneously.
Keep track of whether we've scheduled or not, and make print() use
the scheduled order if we have.
Fix some shift tests that this change tickles. Add unsigned right shift tests.