The existing implementation is translated from C, which uses a
polynomial coefficient very close to 1/6. If the function uses
1/6 as this coeffient, the result of Exp(1) will be more accurate.
And this change doesn't introduce more error to Exp function.
Fixes #20319
Change-Id: I94c236a18cf95570ebb69f7fb99884b0d7cf5f6e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/49294 Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>