This matches the implementation of strings.Repeat and slightly increases
performance:
name old time/op new time/op delta
Repeat-8 145ns ±12% 125ns ±29% -13.35% (p=0.009 n=10+10)
Change-Id: Ic0a0e2ea9e36591286a49def320ddb67fe0b2c50
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/166399
Run-TryBot: Tobias Klauser <tobias.klauser@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
// It panics if count is negative or if
// the result of (len(b) * count) overflows.
func Repeat(b []byte, count int) []byte {
+ if count == 0 {
+ return []byte{}
+ }
// Since we cannot return an error on overflow,
// we should panic if the repeat will generate
// an overflow.
// See Issue golang.org/issue/16237.
if count < 0 {
panic("bytes: negative Repeat count")
- } else if count > 0 && len(b)*count/count != len(b) {
+ } else if len(b)*count/count != len(b) {
panic("bytes: Repeat count causes overflow")
}