test/codegen: fix compilation of bitfield tests

The codegen tests are currently skipped (see #48247) and the
bitfield tests do not actually compile due to a duplicate function
name (sbfiz5) added in CL 267602. Renaming the function fixes the
issue.

Updates #48247.

Change-Id: I626fd5ef13732dc358e73ace9ddcc4cbb6ae5b21
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/348391
Trust: Michael Munday <mike.munday@lowrisc.org>
Run-TryBot: Michael Munday <mike.munday@lowrisc.org>
TryBot-Result: Go Bot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Cherry Mui <cherryyz@google.com>

diff --git a/test/codegen/bitfield.go b/test/codegen/bitfield.go
index d4ffbad85d694c4beaba2ed4f24bcc41e5ff74ae..3ed9cfe60341880f5ee89941ce8ca403f6f48787 100644 (file)
--- a/test/codegen/bitfield.go
+++ b/test/codegen/bitfield.go
@@ -99,10 +99,6 @@ func sbfiz5(x int32) int32 {
        return (x << 4) >> 3
 }
 
-func sbfiz5(x int32) int64 {
-       return int64(x+1) << 40 // arm64:"SBFIZ\t[$]40, R[0-9]+, [$]24",-"LSL"
-}
-
 func sbfiz6(x int16) int64 {
        return int64(x+1) << 3 // arm64:"SBFIZ\t[$]3, R[0-9]+, [$]16",-"LSL"
 }
@@ -111,6 +107,10 @@ func sbfiz7(x int8) int64 {
        return int64(x+1) << 62 // arm64:"SBFIZ\t[$]62, R[0-9]+, [$]2",-"LSL"
 }
 
+func sbfiz8(x int32) int64 {
+       return int64(x+1) << 40 // arm64:"SBFIZ\t[$]40, R[0-9]+, [$]24",-"LSL"
+}
+
 // sbfx
 func sbfx1(x int64) int64 {
        return (x << 3) >> 4 // arm64:"SBFX\t[$]1, R[0-9]+, [$]60",-"LSL",-"ASR"