{"testdata/stdin*.input", "-stdin"},
{"testdata/comments.input", ""},
{"testdata/import.input", ""},
- {"testdata/crlf.input", ""}, // test case for issue 3961; see also TestCRLF
+ {"testdata/crlf.input", ""}, // test case for issue 3961; see also TestCRLF
+ {"testdata/typeswitch.input", ""}, // test case for issue 4470
}
func TestRewrite(t *testing.T) {
--- /dev/null
+/*
+ Parenthesized type switch expressions originally
+ accepted by gofmt must continue to be rewritten
+ into the correct unparenthesized form.
+
+ Only type-switches that didn't declare a variable
+ in the the type switch type assertion and which
+ contained only "expression-like" (named) types in their
+ cases were permitted to have their type assertion parenthesized
+ by go/parser (due to a weak predicate in the parser). All others
+ were rejected always, either with a syntax error in the
+ type switch header or in the case.
+
+ See also issue 4470.
+*/
+package p
+
+func f() {
+ var x interface{}
+ switch x.(type) { // should remain the same
+ }
+ switch x.(type) { // should become: switch x.(type) {
+ }
+
+ switch x.(type) { // should remain the same
+ case int:
+ }
+ switch x.(type) { // should become: switch x.(type) {
+ case int:
+ }
+
+ switch x.(type) { // should remain the same
+ case []int:
+ }
+
+ // Parenthesized (x.(type)) in type switches containing cases
+ // with unnamed (literal) types were never permitted by gofmt;
+ // thus there won't be any code in the wild using this style if
+ // the code was gofmt-ed.
+ /*
+ switch (x.(type)) {
+ case []int:
+ }
+ */
+
+ switch t := x.(type) { // should remain the same
+ default:
+ _ = t
+ }
+
+ // Parenthesized (x.(type)) in type switches declaring a variable
+ // were never permitted by gofmt; thus there won't be any code in
+ // the wild using this style if the code was gofmt-ed.
+ /*
+ switch t := (x.(type)) {
+ default:
+ _ = t
+ }
+ */
+}
--- /dev/null
+/*
+ Parenthesized type switch expressions originally
+ accepted by gofmt must continue to be rewritten
+ into the correct unparenthesized form.
+
+ Only type-switches that didn't declare a variable
+ in the the type switch type assertion and which
+ contained only "expression-like" (named) types in their
+ cases were permitted to have their type assertion parenthesized
+ by go/parser (due to a weak predicate in the parser). All others
+ were rejected always, either with a syntax error in the
+ type switch header or in the case.
+
+ See also issue 4470.
+*/
+package p
+
+func f() {
+ var x interface{}
+ switch x.(type) { // should remain the same
+ }
+ switch (x.(type)) { // should become: switch x.(type) {
+ }
+
+ switch x.(type) { // should remain the same
+ case int:
+ }
+ switch (x.(type)) { // should become: switch x.(type) {
+ case int:
+ }
+
+ switch x.(type) { // should remain the same
+ case []int:
+ }
+
+ // Parenthesized (x.(type)) in type switches containing cases
+ // with unnamed (literal) types were never permitted by gofmt;
+ // thus there won't be any code in the wild using this style if
+ // the code was gofmt-ed.
+ /*
+ switch (x.(type)) {
+ case []int:
+ }
+ */
+
+ switch t := x.(type) { // should remain the same
+ default:
+ _ = t
+ }
+
+ // Parenthesized (x.(type)) in type switches declaring a variable
+ // were never permitted by gofmt; thus there won't be any code in
+ // the wild using this style if the code was gofmt-ed.
+ /*
+ switch t := (x.(type)) {
+ default:
+ _ = t
+ }
+ */
+}