We can't coalesce a non-WB store with a subsequent Move, as the
result of the store might be the source of the move.
There's a simple codegen test. Not sure how we might do a real test,
as all the repro's I've come up with are very expensive and unreliable.
Fixes #71228
Change-Id: If18bf181a266b9b90964e2591cd2e61a7168371c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/642197
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
var start, end int
var nonPtrStores int
values := b.Values
+ hasMove := false
FindSeq:
for i := len(values) - 1; i >= 0; i-- {
w := values[i]
end = i + 1
}
nonPtrStores = 0
+ if w.Op == OpMoveWB {
+ hasMove = true
+ }
case OpVarDef, OpVarLive:
continue
case OpStore:
if nonPtrStores > 2 {
break FindSeq
}
+ if hasMove {
+ // We need to ensure that this store happens
+ // before we issue a wbMove, as the wbMove might
+ // use the result of this store as its source.
+ // Even though this store is not write-barrier
+ // eligible, it might nevertheless be the store
+ // of a pointer to the stack, which is then the
+ // source of the move.
+ // See issue 71228.
+ break FindSeq
+ }
default:
if last == nil {
continue
*q = p
}
}
+
+type S struct {
+ a, b string
+ c *int
+}
+
+var g1, g2 *int
+
+func issue71228(dst *S, ptr *int) {
+ // Make sure that the non-write-barrier write.
+ // "sp.c = ptr" happens before the large write
+ // barrier "*dst = *sp". We approximate testing
+ // that by ensuring that two global variable write
+ // barriers aren't combined.
+ _ = *dst
+ var s S
+ sp := &s
+ //amd64:`.*runtime[.]gcWriteBarrier1`
+ g1 = nil
+ sp.c = ptr // outside of any write barrier
+ //amd64:`.*runtime[.]gcWriteBarrier1`
+ g2 = nil
+ //amd64:`.*runtime[.]wbMove`
+ *dst = *sp
+}