[ ] semantics of statements
[ ] need for type switch? (or use type guard with ok in tuple assignment?)
[ ] do we need anything on package vs file names?
-[ ] Do composite literals create a new literal each time (gri thinks yes)
[ ] type switch or some form of type test needed
[ ] what is the meaning of typeof()
[ ] at the moment: type T S; strips any methods of S. It probably shouldn't.
Closed:
+[x] Do composite literals create a new literal each time (gri thinks yes) (Russ is putting in a change
+ to this effect, essentially)
[x] comparison operators: can we compare interfaces?
[x] can we add methods to types defined in another package? (probably not)
[x] optional semicolons: too complicated and unclear
If LiteralType is a TypeName, the denoted type must be an array, map, or
structure. The types of the expressions must match the respective key, element,
and field types of the literal type; there is no automatic type conversion.
-Composite literals are values of the type specified by LiteralType; to get
+Composite literals are values of the type specified by LiteralType; that is
+a new value is created every time the literal is evaluated. To get
a pointer to the literal, the address operator "&" must be used.
Implementation restriction: Currently, map literals are pointers to maps.