]> Cypherpunks repositories - gostls13.git/commitdiff
runtime/pprof: make TestBlockMutexProfileInlineExpansion stricter
authorNick Ripley <nick.ripley@datadoghq.com>
Tue, 1 Oct 2024 17:51:09 +0000 (13:51 -0400)
committerMichael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Wed, 2 Oct 2024 19:57:33 +0000 (19:57 +0000)
While working on CL 611241 and CL 616375, I introduced a bug that wasn't
caught by any test. CL 611241 added more inline expansion at sample time
for block/mutex profile stacks collected via frame pointer unwinding.
CL 616375 then changed how inline expansion for those stacks is done at
reporting time. So some frames passed through multiple rounds of inline
expansion, and this lead to duplicate stack frames in some cases. The
stacks from TestBlockMutexProfileInlineExpansion looked like

sync.(*Mutex).Unlock
runtime/pprof.inlineF
runtime/pprof.inlineE
runtime/pprof.inlineD
runtime/pprof.inlineD
runtime.goexit

after those two CLs, and in particular after CL 616375. Note the extra
inlineD frame. The test didn't catch that since it was only looking for
a few frames in the stacks rather than checking the entire stacks.

This CL makes that test stricter by checking the entire expected stacks
rather than just a portion of the stacks.

Change-Id: I0acc739d826586e9a63a081bb98ef512d72cdc9a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/617235
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
src/runtime/pprof/pprof_test.go

index e9f287df60c6d460ba715e0af3195a5bf5a45a18..6c41495f030620d8af933113b7b6c84be0cb8430 100644 (file)
@@ -2727,38 +2727,38 @@ func TestBlockMutexProfileInlineExpansion(t *testing.T) {
        wg.Wait()
 
        tcs := []struct {
-               Name     string
-               Collect  func([]runtime.BlockProfileRecord) (int, bool)
-               SubStack string
+               Name    string
+               Collect func([]runtime.BlockProfileRecord) (int, bool)
+               Stack   string
        }{
                {
                        Name:    "mutex",
                        Collect: runtime.MutexProfile,
-                       SubStack: `sync.(*Mutex).Unlock
+                       Stack: `sync.(*Mutex).Unlock
 runtime/pprof.inlineF
 runtime/pprof.inlineE
-runtime/pprof.inlineD`,
+runtime/pprof.inlineD
+runtime.goexit`,
                },
                {
                        Name:    "block",
                        Collect: runtime.BlockProfile,
-                       SubStack: `sync.(*Mutex).Lock
+                       Stack: `sync.(*Mutex).Lock
 runtime/pprof.inlineC
 runtime/pprof.inlineB
-runtime/pprof.inlineA`,
+runtime/pprof.inlineA
+runtime.goexit`,
                },
        }
 
        for _, tc := range tcs {
                t.Run(tc.Name, func(t *testing.T) {
                        stacks := getProfileStacks(tc.Collect, false)
-                       for _, s := range stacks {
-                               if strings.Contains(s, tc.SubStack) {
-                                       return
-                               }
+                       if slices.Contains(stacks, tc.Stack) {
+                               return
                        }
                        t.Error("did not see expected stack")
-                       t.Logf("wanted:\n%s", tc.SubStack)
+                       t.Logf("wanted:\n%s", tc.Stack)
                        t.Logf("got: %s", stacks)
                })
        }