This is a follow-up on https://go-review.googlesource.com/36470
and leads to a more stable fix. The above CL relied on filtering
of multiple errors on the same line to avoid more than one error
for an `if` statement of the form `if a := 10 {}`. This CL avoids
the secondary error ("missing condition in if statement") in the
first place.
For #18915.
Change-Id: I8517f485cc2305965276c17d8f8797d61ef9e999
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36479
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36424
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
return body
}
+var dummyCond = &Name{Value: "false"}
+
func (p *parser) header(forStmt bool) (init SimpleStmt, cond Expr, post SimpleStmt) {
if p.tok == _Lbrace {
return
case *ExprStmt:
cond = s.X
default:
- // Not obviously a syntax error but by making it one, we get
- // automatic filtering of multiple syntax error messages per
- // line in the compiler. This avoids the follow-up error
- // "missing condition in if statement" for an if statement
- // (minimal fix for #18915).
p.syntax_error(fmt.Sprintf("%s used as value", String(s)))
+ cond = dummyCond // avoid follow-up error for if statements
}
p.xnest = outer