Ensure that during rewriting of expressions that take the address of
an array, that we properly recognize *ast.IndexExpr as an operation
to create a pointer variable and thus assign the proper addressOf
and deference operators as "&" and "*" respectively.
This fixes a regression from CL 142884.
This is a backport of CLs 183458 and 183778 to the 1.12 release branch.
It is not a cherry pick because the code in misc/cgo/test has changed.
Updates #32579
Fixes #32756
Change-Id: I0daa75ec62cccbe82ab658cb2947f51423e0c235
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/183627
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
func Test27660(t *testing.T) { test27660(t) }
func Test28896(t *testing.T) { test28896(t) }
func Test30065(t *testing.T) { test30065(t) }
+func Test32579(t *testing.T) { test32579(t) }
func BenchmarkCgoCall(b *testing.B) { benchCgoCall(b) }
func BenchmarkGoString(b *testing.B) { benchGoString(b) }
--- /dev/null
+// Copyright 2019 The Go Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style
+// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
+
+package cgotest
+
+// #include <string.h>
+// typedef struct S32579 { unsigned char data[1]; } S32579;
+import "C"
+
+import (
+ "testing"
+ "unsafe"
+)
+
+func test32579(t *testing.T) {
+ var s [1]C.struct_S32579
+ C.memset(unsafe.Pointer(&s[0].data[0]), 1, 1)
+ if s[0].data[0] != 1 {
+ t.Errorf("&s[0].data[0] failed: got %d, want %d", s[0].data[0], 1)
+ }
+}
return true
case *ast.SelectorExpr:
return p.isVariable(x.X)
+ case *ast.IndexExpr:
+ return true
}
return false
}