// if it encounters an Unmarshaler, indirect stops and returns that.
// if decodingNull is true, indirect stops at the last pointer so it can be set to nil.
func (d *decodeState) indirect(v reflect.Value, decodingNull bool) (Unmarshaler, encoding.TextUnmarshaler, reflect.Value) {
+ // Issue #24153 indicates that it is generally not a guaranteed property
+ // that you may round-trip a reflect.Value by calling Value.Addr().Elem()
+ // and expect the value to still be settable for values derived from
+ // unexported embedded struct fields.
+ //
+ // The logic below effectively does this when it first addresses the value
+ // (to satisfy possible pointer methods) and continues to dereference
+ // subsequent pointers as necessary.
+ //
+ // After the first round-trip, we set v back to the original value to
+ // preserve the original RW flags contained in reflect.Value.
+ v0 := v
+ haveAddr := false
+
// If v is a named type and is addressable,
// start with its address, so that if the type has pointer methods,
// we find them.
if v.Kind() != reflect.Ptr && v.Type().Name() != "" && v.CanAddr() {
+ haveAddr = true
v = v.Addr()
}
for {
if v.Kind() == reflect.Interface && !v.IsNil() {
e := v.Elem()
if e.Kind() == reflect.Ptr && !e.IsNil() && (!decodingNull || e.Elem().Kind() == reflect.Ptr) {
+ haveAddr = false
v = e
continue
}
}
}
}
- v = v.Elem()
+
+ if haveAddr {
+ v = v0 // restore original value after round-trip Value.Addr().Elem()
+ haveAddr = false
+ } else {
+ v = v.Elem()
+ }
}
return nil, nil, v
}
}
}
-// Test unmarshal behavior with regards to embedded pointers to unexported structs.
-// If unallocated, this returns an error because unmarshal cannot set the field.
-// Issue 21357.
-func TestUnmarshalEmbeddedPointerUnexported(t *testing.T) {
+// Test unmarshal behavior with regards to embedded unexported structs.
+//
+// (Issue 21357) If the embedded struct is a pointer and is unallocated,
+// this returns an error because unmarshal cannot set the field.
+//
+// (Issue 24152) If the embedded struct is given an explicit name,
+// ensure that the normal unmarshal logic does not panic in reflect.
+func TestUnmarshalEmbeddedUnexported(t *testing.T) {
type (
embed1 struct{ Q int }
embed2 struct{ Q int }
*embed3
R int
}
+ S6 struct {
+ embed1 `json:"embed1"`
+ }
+ S7 struct {
+ embed1 `json:"embed1"`
+ embed2
+ }
+ S8 struct {
+ embed1 `json:"embed1"`
+ embed2 `json:"embed2"`
+ Q int
+ }
)
tests := []struct {
ptr: new(S5),
out: &S5{R: 2},
err: fmt.Errorf("json: cannot set embedded pointer to unexported struct: json.embed3"),
+ }, {
+ // Issue 24152, ensure decodeState.indirect does not panic.
+ in: `{"embed1": {"Q": 1}}`,
+ ptr: new(S6),
+ out: &S6{embed1{1}},
+ }, {
+ // Issue 24153, check that we can still set forwarded fields even in
+ // the presence of a name conflict.
+ //
+ // This relies on obscure behavior of reflect where it is possible
+ // to set a forwarded exported field on an unexported embedded struct
+ // even though there is a name conflict, even when it would have been
+ // impossible to do so according to Go visibility rules.
+ // Go forbids this because it is ambiguous whether S7.Q refers to
+ // S7.embed1.Q or S7.embed2.Q. Since embed1 and embed2 are unexported,
+ // it should be impossible for an external package to set either Q.
+ //
+ // It is probably okay for a future reflect change to break this.
+ in: `{"embed1": {"Q": 1}, "Q": 2}`,
+ ptr: new(S7),
+ out: &S7{embed1{1}, embed2{2}},
+ }, {
+ // Issue 24153, similar to the S7 case.
+ in: `{"embed1": {"Q": 1}, "embed2": {"Q": 2}, "Q": 3}`,
+ ptr: new(S8),
+ out: &S8{embed1{1}, embed2{2}, 3},
}}
for i, tt := range tests {