Currently allocation checks the GC trigger speculatively during
allocation and then triggers the GC without rechecking. As a result,
it's possible for G 1 and G 2 to detect the trigger simultaneously,
both enter startGC, G 1 actually starts GC while G 2 gets preempted
until after the whole GC cycle, then G 2 immediately starts another GC
cycle even though the heap is now well under the trigger.
Fix this by re-checking the GC trigger non-speculatively just before
actually kicking off a new GC cycle.
This contributes to #11911 because when this happens, we definitely
don't finish the background sweep before starting the next GC cycle,
which can significantly delay the start of concurrent scan.
Change-Id: I560ab79ba5684ba435084410a9765d28f5745976
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/13025
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rick Hudson <rlh@golang.org>
// trigger concurrent GC
readied := false
lock(&bggc.lock)
+ // The trigger was originally checked speculatively, so
+ // recheck that this really should trigger GC. (For example,
+ // we may have gone through a whole GC cycle since the
+ // speculative check.)
+ if !shouldtriggergc() {
+ unlock(&bggc.lock)
+ return
+ }
if !bggc.started {
bggc.working = 1
bggc.started = true