return
}
+// containsLinebreak reports whether the whitespace buffer contains any line breaks.
+func (p *printer) containsLinebreak() bool {
+ for _, ch := range p.wsbuf {
+ if ch == newline || ch == formfeed {
+ return true
+ }
+ }
+ return false
+}
+
// intersperseComments consumes all comments that appear before the next token
// tok and prints it together with the buffered whitespace (i.e., the whitespace
// that needs to be written before the next token). A heuristic is used to mix
}
if last != nil {
- // if the last comment is a /*-style comment and the next item
+ // If the last comment is a /*-style comment and the next item
// follows on the same line but is not a comma, and not a "closing"
// token immediately following its corresponding "opening" token,
- // add an extra blank for separation unless explicitly disabled
+ // add an extra separator unless explicitly disabled. Use a blank
+ // as separator unless we have pending linebreaks and they are not
+ // disabled, in which case we want a linebreak (issue 15137).
+ needsLinebreak := false
if p.mode&noExtraBlank == 0 &&
last.Text[1] == '*' && p.lineFor(last.Pos()) == next.Line &&
tok != token.COMMA &&
(tok != token.RPAREN || p.prevOpen == token.LPAREN) &&
(tok != token.RBRACK || p.prevOpen == token.LBRACK) {
- p.writeByte(' ', 1)
+ if p.containsLinebreak() && p.mode&noExtraLinebreak == 0 {
+ needsLinebreak = true
+ } else {
+ p.writeByte(' ', 1)
+ }
+ }
+ // Ensure that there is a line break after a //-style comment,
+ // before EOF, and before a closing '}' unless explicitly disabled.
+ if last.Text[1] == '/' ||
+ tok == token.EOF ||
+ tok == token.RBRACE && p.mode&noExtraLinebreak == 0 {
+ needsLinebreak = true
}
- // ensure that there is a line break after a //-style comment,
- // before a closing '}' unless explicitly disabled, or at eof
- needsLinebreak :=
- last.Text[1] == '/' ||
- tok == token.RBRACE && p.mode&noExtraLinebreak == 0 ||
- tok == token.EOF
return p.writeCommentSuffix(needsLinebreak)
}
_ = a
}
+// Test cases from issues 11274, 15137:
+// Semicolon must not be lost when multiple statements are on the same line with a comment.
+func _() {
+ x := 0 /**/; y := 1
+}
+
+func _() {
+ f(); f()
+ f(); /* comment */ f()
+ f() /* comment */; f()
+ f(); /* a */ /* b */ f()
+ f() /* a */ /* b */; f()
+ f() /* a */; /* b */ f()
+}
+
+func _() {
+ f() /* a */ /* b */ }
+
// Comments immediately adjacent to punctuation followed by a newline
// remain after the punctuation (looks better and permits alignment of
// comments).