spec: remove example explaining that type B0 and B0 are identical

Every few months we get a new error report claiming that there
is a typo in the spec related to this specific example. Clearly,
the fact that two types with the same identifier are identical
seems exceedingly obvious to readers; thus the example seems not
worth the trouble. Removing it.

For #9226.
For #22202.
For #22495.
For #23096.
For #23409.

There may be more.

Change-Id: I003ba79dc460ffb028a4ecb5f29efd60f2551912
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/87417
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>

diff --git a/doc/go_spec.html b/doc/go_spec.html
index 0f55b075a64e2643c09de74faf2b91788bb16c7b..f009ec0054997c2d59df2b82b8272e0c305ec3ec 100644 (file)
--- a/doc/go_spec.html
+++ b/doc/go_spec.html
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 <!--{
        "Title": "The Go Programming Language Specification",
-       "Subtitle": "Version of January 9, 2018",
+       "Subtitle": "Version of January 11, 2018",
        "Path": "/ref/spec"
 }-->
 
@@ -1495,7 +1495,7 @@ A2 and struct{ a, b int }
 A3 and int
 A4, func(int, float64) *[]string, and A5
 
-B0, B0, and C0
+B0 and C0
 []int and []int
 struct{ a, b *T5 } and struct{ a, b *T5 }
 func(x int, y float64) *[]string, func(int, float64) (result *[]string), and A5