Computers are enormously quicker but software development is not faster.
<li>
Dependency management is a big part of software development today but the
-"header files" of languages in the C tradition are antithetical to clean
+“header files” of languages in the C tradition are antithetical to clean
dependency analysis—and fast compilation.
<li>
There is a growing rebellion against cumbersome type systems like those of
What is the origin of the name?</h3>
<p>
-"Ogle" would be a good name for a Go debugger.
+“Ogle” would be a good name for a Go debugger.
<h3 id="What_kind_of_a_name_is_6g">
What kind of a name is 6g?</h3>
<p>
The <code>6g</code> (and <code>8g</code> and <code>5g</code>) compiler is named in the
tradition of the Plan 9 C compilers, described in
-<a href="http://plan9.bell-labs.com/sys/doc/compiler.html ">
+<a href="http://plan9.bell-labs.com/sys/doc/compiler.html">
http://plan9.bell-labs.com/sys/doc/compiler.html</a>
(see the table in section 2).
<p>
Go is an experiment. We hope adventurous users will give it a try and see
if they enjoy it. Not every programmer
-will but we hope enough will find satisfaction in the approach it
+will, but we hope enough will find satisfaction in the approach it
offers to justify further development.
<h3 id="Do_Go_programs_link_with_Cpp_programs">
unwise to do so, at least naively.
<p>
-There is a 'foreign function interface' to allow safe calling of C-written
+There is a “foreign function interface” to allow safe calling of C-written
libraries from Go code. We expect to use SWIG to extend this capability
to C++ libraries. There is no safe way to call Go code from C or C++ yet.
<p>
Yes and no. Although Go has types and methods and allows an
object-oriented style of programming, there is no type hierarchy.
-The concept of "interface" in Go provides a different approach that
+The concept of “interface” in Go provides a different approach that
we believe is easy to use and in some ways more general. There are
also ways to embed types in other types to provide something
analogous—but not identical—to subclassing.
<p>
Also, the lack of type hierarchy makes “objects” in Go feel much more
-lightweight than in languages such as C++ and Java.
+lightweight than in languages such as C++ or Java.
<h3 id="How_do_I_get_dynamic_dispatch_of_methods">
How do I get dynamic dispatch of methods?</h3>
package documentation from the source code. It can be used on the
command line or on the web. An instance is running at
<a href="http://golang.org/pkg/">http://golang.org/pkg/</a>.
-In fact, <code>godoc</code> implements the full site at
+In fact, <code>godoc</code> implements the full site at
<a href="http://golang.org/">http://golang.org/</a>.
<h3 id="Is_there_a_Go_programming_style_guide">
<p>
Again due to bootstrapping issues, the runtime is mostly in C (with a
tiny bit of assembler) although Go is capable of implementing most of
-it now. <code>Gccgo</code>'s runtime uses <code>glibc</code>;
+it now. <code>Gccgo</code>'s runtime uses <code>glibc</code>.
<code>Gc</code> uses a custom library, to keep the footprint under
control; it is
compiled with a version of the Plan 9 C compiler that supports
segmented stacks for goroutines.
-work is underway to provide the same stack management in
+Work is underway to provide the same stack management in
<code>gccgo</code>.