In 31618, we end up comparing the is-stmt-ness of positions
to repurpose real instructions as inline marks. If the is-stmt-ness
doesn't match, we end up not being able to remove the inline mark.
Always use statement-full positions to do the matching, so we
always find a match if there is one.
Also always use positions that are statements for inline marks.
Fixes #31618
Change-Id: Idaf39bdb32fa45238d5cd52973cadf4504f947d5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/173324
Run-TryBot: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
// to put a breakpoint. Not sure if that's really necessary or not
// (in which case it could go at the end of the function instead).
inlMark := nod(OINLMARK, nil, nil)
- inlMark.Pos = n.Pos.WithDefaultStmt()
+ inlMark.Pos = n.Pos.WithIsStmt()
inlMark.Xoffset = int64(newIndex)
ninit.Append(inlMark)
// We found an instruction with the same source position as
// some of the inline marks.
// Use this instruction instead.
+ p.Pos = p.Pos.WithIsStmt() // promote position to a statement
pp.curfn.Func.lsym.Func.AddInlMark(p, inlMarks[m])
// Make the inline mark a real nop, so it doesn't generate any code.
m.As = obj.ANOP
}
func (x lico) atColumn1() lico {
- return makeLico(x.Line(), 1) | (x & (isStmtMask | xlogueMask))
+ return makeLico(x.Line(), 1).withIsStmt()
}
--- /dev/null
+// asmcheck
+
+// Copyright 2019 The Go Authors. All rights reserved.
+// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style
+// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
+
+package codegen
+
+// Make sure we remove both inline marks in the following code.
+// Both +5 and +6 should map to real instructions, which can
+// be used as inline marks instead of explicit nops.
+func f(x int) int {
+ // amd64:-"XCHGL"
+ x = g(x) + 5
+ // amd64:-"XCHGL"
+ x = g(x) + 6
+ return x
+}
+
+func g(x int) int {
+ return x >> 3
+}