From: zdjones Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2019 17:28:05 +0000 (+0000) Subject: cmd/compile: make prove learn index >= 0 from successful bounds checks X-Git-Tag: go1.13beta1~841 X-Git-Url: http://www.git.cypherpunks.su/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=2d41444ad0c1540f064695a9a4678dda6c0d2a51;p=gostls13.git cmd/compile: make prove learn index >= 0 from successful bounds checks When branching at a bounds check for indexing or slicing ops, prove currently only learns from the upper bound. On the positive branch, we currently learn i < len(a) (or i <= len(a)) in both the signed and unsigned domains. This CL makes prove also learn from the lower bound. Specifically, on the positive branch from index or slicing ops, prove will now ALSO learn i >= 0 in the signed domain (this fact is of no value in the unsigned domain). The substantive change itself is only an additional call to addRestrictions, though I've also inverted the nested switch statements around that call for the sake of clarity. This CL removes 92 bounds checks from std and cmd. It passes all tests and shows no deltas on compilecmp. Fixes #28885 Change-Id: I13eccc36e640eb599fa6dc5aa3be3c7d7abd2d9e Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/170121 Run-TryBot: Daniel Martí TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot Reviewed-by: Giovanni Bajo --- diff --git a/src/cmd/compile/internal/ssa/prove.go b/src/cmd/compile/internal/ssa/prove.go index f70ec0c830..973e3cd4f2 100644 --- a/src/cmd/compile/internal/ssa/prove.go +++ b/src/cmd/compile/internal/ssa/prove.go @@ -931,31 +931,41 @@ func addBranchRestrictions(ft *factsTable, b *Block, br branch) { if d == signed && ft.isNonNegative(c.Args[0]) && ft.isNonNegative(c.Args[1]) { d |= unsigned } - switch br { - case negative: - switch b.Control.Op { // Special cases - case OpIsInBounds, OpIsSliceInBounds: - // 0 <= a0 < a1 (or 0 <= a0 <= a1) - // - // On the positive branch, we learn a0 < a1, - // both signed and unsigned. - // - // On the negative branch, we learn (0 > a0 || - // a0 >= a1). In the unsigned domain, this is - // simply a0 >= a1 (which is the reverse of the - // positive branch, so nothing surprising). - // But in the signed domain, we can't express the || - // condition, so check if a0 is non-negative instead, - // to be able to learn something. + switch b.Control.Op { + case OpIsInBounds, OpIsSliceInBounds: + // 0 <= a0 < a1 (or 0 <= a0 <= a1) + // + // On the positive branch, we learn: + // signed: 0 <= a0 < a1 (or 0 <= a0 <= a1) + // unsigned: a0 < a1 (or a0 <= a1) + // + // On the negative branch, we learn (0 > a0 || + // a0 >= a1). In the unsigned domain, this is + // simply a0 >= a1 (which is the reverse of the + // positive branch, so nothing surprising). + // But in the signed domain, we can't express the || + // condition, so check if a0 is non-negative instead, + // to be able to learn something. + switch br { + case negative: d = unsigned if ft.isNonNegative(c.Args[0]) { d |= signed } + addRestrictions(b, ft, d, c.Args[0], c.Args[1], tr.r^(lt|gt|eq)) + case positive: + addRestrictions(b, ft, signed, ft.zero, c.Args[0], lt|eq) + addRestrictions(b, ft, d, c.Args[0], c.Args[1], tr.r) + } + default: + switch br { + case negative: + addRestrictions(b, ft, d, c.Args[0], c.Args[1], tr.r^(lt|gt|eq)) + case positive: + addRestrictions(b, ft, d, c.Args[0], c.Args[1], tr.r) } - addRestrictions(b, ft, d, c.Args[0], c.Args[1], tr.r^(lt|gt|eq)) - case positive: - addRestrictions(b, ft, d, c.Args[0], c.Args[1], tr.r) } + } } diff --git a/test/prove.go b/test/prove.go index 39b23c5e0a..6e92b9eec2 100644 --- a/test/prove.go +++ b/test/prove.go @@ -726,6 +726,16 @@ func signHint2(b []byte, n int) { } } +// indexGT0 tests whether prove learns int index >= 0 from bounds check. +func indexGT0(b []byte, n int) { + _ = b[n] + _ = b[25] + + for i := n; i <= 25; i++ { // ERROR "Induction variable: limits \[\?,25\], increment 1$" + b[i] = 123 // ERROR "Proved IsInBounds$" + } +} + // Induction variable in unrolled loop. func unrollUpExcl(a []int) int { var i, x int