From: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 16:45:36 +0000 (-0500)
Subject: math/rand: improve uniformity of rand.Float64,Float32
X-Git-Tag: go1.6beta1~112
X-Git-Url: http://www.git.cypherpunks.su/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=38255cbd1b0b671dae1fa84863f2e63355c61459;p=gostls13.git

math/rand: improve uniformity of rand.Float64,Float32

Replaced code that substituted 0 for rounded-up 1 with
code to try again.  This has minimal effect on the existing
stream of random numbers, but restores uniformity.

Fixes #12290.

Change-Id: Ib68f0b0a4a173339bcd0274cc16509f7b0977de8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/17670
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
---

diff --git a/src/math/rand/rand.go b/src/math/rand/rand.go
index 925d381cb2..d693bfb52f 100644
--- a/src/math/rand/rand.go
+++ b/src/math/rand/rand.go
@@ -113,19 +113,18 @@ func (r *Rand) Float64() float64 {
 	//
 	// There is one bug in the value stream: r.Int63() may be so close
 	// to 1<<63 that the division rounds up to 1.0, and we've guaranteed
-	// that the result is always less than 1.0. To fix that, we treat the
-	// range as cyclic and map 1 back to 0. This is justified by observing
-	// that while some of the values rounded down to 0, nothing was
-	// rounding up to 0, so 0 was underrepresented in the results.
-	// Mapping 1 back to zero restores some balance.
-	// (The balance is not perfect because the implementation
-	// returns denormalized numbers for very small r.Int63(),
-	// and those steal from what would normally be 0 results.)
-	// The remapping only happens 1/2⁵³ of the time, so most clients
+	// that the result is always less than 1.0.
+	//
+	// We tried to fix this by mapping 1.0 back to 0.0, but since float64
+	// values near 0 are much denser than near 1, mapping 1 to 0 caused
+	// a theoretically significant overshoot in the probability of returning 0.
+	// Instead of that, if we round up to 1, just try again.
+	// Getting 1 only happens 1/2⁵³ of the time, so most clients
 	// will not observe it anyway.
+again:
 	f := float64(r.Int63()) / (1 << 63)
 	if f == 1 {
-		f = 0
+		goto again // resample; this branch is taken O(never)
 	}
 	return f
 }
@@ -134,13 +133,11 @@ func (r *Rand) Float64() float64 {
 func (r *Rand) Float32() float32 {
 	// Same rationale as in Float64: we want to preserve the Go 1 value
 	// stream except we want to fix it not to return 1.0
-	// There is a double rounding going on here, but the argument for
-	// mapping 1 to 0 still applies: 0 was underrepresented before,
-	// so mapping 1 to 0 doesn't cause too many 0s.
 	// This only happens 1/2²⁴ of the time (plus the 1/2⁵³ of the time in Float64).
+again:
 	f := float32(r.Float64())
 	if f == 1 {
-		f = 0
+		goto again // resample; this branch is taken O(very rarely)
 	}
 	return f
 }