From: Rob Pike Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2017 03:47:13 +0000 (+1000) Subject: cmd/vet: fix a couple of minor word choices in README X-Git-Tag: go1.10beta1~1616 X-Git-Url: http://www.git.cypherpunks.su/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=b1fab099011b2ec9499e99a32ed8de515e576b86;p=gostls13.git cmd/vet: fix a couple of minor word choices in README No semantic change, just clarifying a bit by choosing better words in a couple of places. Change-Id: I4496062ee7909baf83d4d22d25e13ef93b358b4b Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/55255 Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor --- diff --git a/src/cmd/vet/README b/src/cmd/vet/README index 56d48897ea..5ab75494d3 100644 --- a/src/cmd/vet/README +++ b/src/cmd/vet/README @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ Vet is a tool that checks correctness of Go programs. It runs a suite of tests, each tailored to check for a particular class of errors. Examples include incorrect -Printf format verbs or malformed build tags. +Printf format verbs and malformed build tags. Over time many checks have been added to vet's suite, but many more have been rejected as not appropriate for the tool. The criteria applied when selecting which @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ checks to add are: Correctness: -Vet's tools are about correctness, not style. A vet check must identify real or +Vet's checks are about correctness, not style. A vet check must identify real or potential bugs that could cause incorrect compilation or execution. A check that only identifies stylistic points or alternative correct approaches to a situation is not acceptable.