From 10cdb92000de7d6b5489f33e12e4533fdbb3f69c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Brad Fitzpatrick Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 12:00:40 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] doc: fix another broken link Fixes #5316 R=golang-dev, r, minux.ma CC=golang-dev https://golang.org/cl/8871043 --- doc/articles/godoc_documenting_go_code.html | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/articles/godoc_documenting_go_code.html b/doc/articles/godoc_documenting_go_code.html index 96ae7451d0..3f4e3228c7 100644 --- a/doc/articles/godoc_documenting_go_code.html +++ b/doc/articles/godoc_documenting_go_code.html @@ -83,11 +83,14 @@ godoc's output, with one notable exception. Top-level comments that begin with the word "BUG(who)" are recognized as known bugs, and included in the "Bugs" section of the package documentation. The "who" part should be the user name of someone who could provide more information. For example, this is a -known issue from the bytes package: +known issue from the sync/atomic package:

-// BUG(r): The rule Title uses for word boundaries does not handle Unicode punctuation properly.
+// BUG(rsc): On x86-32, the 64-bit functions use instructions
+// unavailable before the Pentium MMX. On both ARM and x86-32, it is the
+// caller's responsibility to arrange for 64-bit alignment of 64-bit
+// words accessed atomically.
 

-- 2.48.1