From aeb2c2a8966387312336768d7e7496d2cfd3cd16 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Filippo Valsorda Date: Sat, 18 May 2024 20:15:38 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] crypto/tls: remove typeNextProtocol Was this strictly necessary? No. Did this deserve its own CL? Maybe not. But I have a personal vendetta against NPN. Change-Id: Ide1ad1092259dc23e3ead5c1d5269fc5cb2793d7 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/587275 Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker Auto-Submit: Filippo Valsorda Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI --- src/crypto/tls/common.go | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/crypto/tls/common.go b/src/crypto/tls/common.go index 14a8daedad..1b0f19da9e 100644 --- a/src/crypto/tls/common.go +++ b/src/crypto/tls/common.go @@ -93,7 +93,6 @@ const ( typeFinished uint8 = 20 typeCertificateStatus uint8 = 22 typeKeyUpdate uint8 = 24 - typeNextProtocol uint8 = 67 // Not IANA assigned typeMessageHash uint8 = 254 // synthetic message ) -- 2.48.1